Anki Deck Changes

Commit: 76843b3a - fix some cards flagged by Lolo

Author: obrhubr <obrhubr@gmail.com>

Date: 2025-12-10T07:57:09+01:00

Changes: 17 note(s) changed (0 added, 13 modified, 4 deleted)

ℹ️ Cosmetic Changes Hidden: 2 note(s) had formatting-only changes and are not shown below

Note 1: ETH::DiskMat

Deck: ETH::DiskMat
Note Type: Basic (with MathJax)
GUID: LWf)m2..vK
modified

Before

Front

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::3._Sets,_Relations,_and_Functions::4._Equivalence_Relations::1._Definition_of_Equivalence_Relations PlsFix::RenderErrors
What three properties must a relation have to be an equivalence relation?

Back

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::3._Sets,_Relations,_and_Functions::4._Equivalence_Relations::1._Definition_of_Equivalence_Relations PlsFix::RenderErrors
What three properties must a relation have to be an equivalence relation?

1. Reflexive 2. Symmetric 3. Transitive

After

Front

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::3._Sets,_Relations,_and_Functions::4._Equivalence_Relations::1._Definition_of_Equivalence_Relations
What three properties must a relation have to be an equivalence relation?

Back

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::3._Sets,_Relations,_and_Functions::4._Equivalence_Relations::1._Definition_of_Equivalence_Relations
What three properties must a relation have to be an equivalence relation?

  1. Reflexive
  2. Symmetric
  3. Transitive
Field-by-field Comparison
Field Before After
Back 1. <span style="color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><b>Reflexive</b></span> 2. <b>Symmetric</b> 3. <b>Transitive</b> <ol><li><span><b>Reflexive</b></span></li><li><b>Symmetric</b></li><li><b>Transitive</b></li></ol>
Tags: PlsFix::RenderErrors ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::3._Sets,_Relations,_and_Functions::4._Equivalence_Relations::1._Definition_of_Equivalence_Relations

Note 2: ETH::DiskMat

Deck: ETH::DiskMat
Note Type: Basic (with MathJax)
GUID: K>1Kv;vQr=
modified

Before

Front

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::3._Sets,_Relations,_and_Functions::5._Partial_Order_Relations::1._Definition PlsFix::NiklasWTHman
Why is \((\mathcal{P}(\{1,2,3\}); \subseteq)\) NOT totally ordered?

Back

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::3._Sets,_Relations,_and_Functions::5._Partial_Order_Relations::1._Definition PlsFix::NiklasWTHman
Why is \((\mathcal{P}(\{1,2,3\}); \subseteq)\) NOT totally ordered?

Because \(\{2, 3\} \not\subseteq \{3, 4\}\) and \(\{3, 4\} \not\subseteq \{2, 3\}\) (they are incomparable).

After

Front

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::3._Sets,_Relations,_and_Functions::5._Partial_Order_Relations::1._Definition
Why is \((\mathcal{P}(\{1,2,3\}); \subseteq)\) NOT totally ordered?

Back

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::3._Sets,_Relations,_and_Functions::5._Partial_Order_Relations::1._Definition
Why is \((\mathcal{P}(\{1,2,3\}); \subseteq)\) NOT totally ordered?

Because \(\{2, 3\} \not\subseteq \{3, 1\}\) and \(\{3, 1\} \not\subseteq \{2, 3\}\) (they are incomparable).
Field-by-field Comparison
Field Before After
Back Because \(\{2, 3\} \not\subseteq \{3, 4\}\) and \(\{3, 4\} \not\subseteq \{2, 3\}\) (they are incomparable). Because \(\{2, 3\} \not\subseteq \{3, 1\}\) and \(\{3, 1\} \not\subseteq \{2, 3\}\) (they are incomparable).
Tags: PlsFix::NiklasWTHman ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::3._Sets,_Relations,_and_Functions::5._Partial_Order_Relations::1._Definition

Note 3: ETH::DiskMat

Deck: ETH::DiskMat
Note Type: Basic (with MathJax)
GUID: jAR2Tu9;l8
modified

Before

Front

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::2._Math._Reasoning,_Proofs,_and_a_First_Approach_to_Logic::3._A_First_Introduction_to_Propositional_Logic::6._Tautologies_and_Satisfiability PlsFix::RenderErrors
When is writing \(\top\) or \(\perp\) allowed in formulas (proof steps for example)?

Back

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::2._Math._Reasoning,_Proofs,_and_a_First_Approach_to_Logic::3._A_First_Introduction_to_Propositional_Logic::6._Tautologies_and_Satisfiability PlsFix::RenderErrors
When is writing \(\top\) or \(\perp\) allowed in formulas (proof steps for example)?

We are not allowed to use $\top$ or $\perp$ in formulas, to replace statement that are `true` or `false` under our interpretation.

It's only allowed when the formula is actually a tautology (or unsatisfiable), i.e. true or false under all interpretations!

For example, in $U = \mathbb{N}$, $x \geq 0 \land x = 5 \implies \top \land x = 5 \implies x = 5$ but this is wrong as $x \geq 0$ is only equivalent to $\top$ in this specific universe. We instead can just write the implication directly.

After

Front

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::2._Math._Reasoning,_Proofs,_and_a_First_Approach_to_Logic::3._A_First_Introduction_to_Propositional_Logic::6._Tautologies_and_Satisfiability
When is writing \(\top\) or \(\perp\) allowed in formulas (proof steps for example)?

Back

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::2._Math._Reasoning,_Proofs,_and_a_First_Approach_to_Logic::3._A_First_Introduction_to_Propositional_Logic::6._Tautologies_and_Satisfiability
When is writing \(\top\) or \(\perp\) allowed in formulas (proof steps for example)?

We are not allowed to use \(\top\) or \(\perp\) in formulas, to replace statement that are true or false under our interpretation.

It's only allowed when the formula is actually a tautology (or unsatisfiable), i.e. true or false under all interpretations!

For example, in \(U = \mathbb{N}\), \(x \geq 0 \land x = 5 \implies \top \land x = 5 \implies x = 5\) but this is wrong as \(x \geq 0\) is only equivalent to \(\top\) in this specific universe. We instead can just write the implication directly.
Field-by-field Comparison
Field Before After
Back We are not allowed to use $\top$ or $\perp$ in formulas, to replace statement that are `true` or `false` under our interpretation.<br><br>It's only allowed when the formula is actually a tautology (or unsatisfiable), i.e. true or false under <b>all</b>&nbsp;interpretations!<br><br>For example, in $U = \mathbb{N}$, $x \geq 0 \land x = 5 \implies \top \land x = 5 \implies x = 5$ but this is wrong as $x \geq 0$ is only equivalent to $\top$ in this specific universe. We instead can just write the implication directly. We are not allowed to use \(\top\)&nbsp;or&nbsp;\(\perp\)&nbsp;in formulas, to replace statement that are <b>true</b>&nbsp;or <b>false</b>&nbsp;under our interpretation.<br><br>It's only allowed when the formula is actually a tautology (or unsatisfiable), i.e. true or false under <b>all</b>&nbsp;interpretations!<br><br>For example, in \(U = \mathbb{N}\),&nbsp;\(x \geq 0 \land x = 5 \implies \top \land x = 5 \implies x = 5\)&nbsp;but this is wrong as&nbsp;\(x \geq 0\)&nbsp;is only equivalent to&nbsp;\(\top\)&nbsp;in this specific universe. We instead can just write the implication directly.
Tags: PlsFix::RenderErrors ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::2._Math._Reasoning,_Proofs,_and_a_First_Approach_to_Logic::3._A_First_Introduction_to_Propositional_Logic::6._Tautologies_and_Satisfiability

Note 4: ETH::DiskMat

Deck: ETH::DiskMat
Note Type: Basic (with MathJax)
GUID: E7<;U^~bFt
modified

Before

Front

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::3._The_Structure_of_Groups::8._The_Group_Zₘ*_and_Euler's_Function PlsFix::RenderErrors
Reduce \(R_{11}(9^{2024})\)

Back

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::3._The_Structure_of_Groups::8._The_Group_Zₘ*_and_Euler's_Function PlsFix::RenderErrors
Reduce \(R_{11}(9^{2024})\)

As $9^{10} \equiv_{11} 1$ (see Fermat little theorem and 11 prime), we can reduce the exponent modulo $10$ (see Lagrange's theorem in chapter 5). Thus $R_{11}(9^{2024}) = R_{11}(9^{4}) = R_{11}(-2^{4}) = 5$.

For this to work however, we need the *number and the order of the group* (modulo remainder) to be *coprime*, i.e. $\gcd(9, 11) = 1$.
If the modulus itself is prime then it always works and the order of the element can be used to reduce the exponent as 9^{11-1} = 1 by FLT.

After

Front

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::3._The_Structure_of_Groups::8._The_Group_Zₘ*_and_Euler's_Function
Reduce \(R_{11}(9^{2024})\)

Back

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::3._The_Structure_of_Groups::8._The_Group_Zₘ*_and_Euler's_Function
Reduce \(R_{11}(9^{2024})\)

As \(9^{10} \equiv_{11} 1\) (see Fermat little theorem and 11 prime), we can reduce the exponent modulo $10$ (see Lagrange's theorem in chapter 5). Thus \(R_{11}(9^{2024}) = R_{11}(9^{4}) = R_{11}(-2^{4}) = 5\).

For this to work however, we need the *number and the order of the group* (modulo remainder) to be coprime, i.e. \(\gcd(9, 11) = 1\).
If the modulus itself is prime then it always works and the order of the element can be used to reduce the exponent as \(9^{11-1} = 1\) by FLT.
Field-by-field Comparison
Field Before After
Back As $9^{10} \equiv_{11} 1$ (see Fermat little theorem and 11 prime), we can reduce the exponent modulo $10$ (see Lagrange's theorem in chapter 5). Thus $R_{11}(9^{2024}) = R_{11}(9^{4}) = R_{11}(-2^{4}) = 5$.<br><br>For this to work however, we need the *number and the order of the group* (modulo remainder) to be *coprime*, i.e. $\gcd(9, 11) = 1$.<div>If the modulus itself is prime then it always works and the order of the element can be used to reduce the exponent as 9^{11-1} = 1 by FLT.</div> As \(9^{10} \equiv_{11} 1\)&nbsp;(see Fermat little theorem and 11 prime), we can reduce the exponent modulo $10$ (see Lagrange's theorem in chapter 5). Thus \(R_{11}(9^{2024}) = R_{11}(9^{4}) = R_{11}(-2^{4}) = 5\).<br><br>For this to work however, we need the *number and the order of the group* (modulo remainder) to be <i>coprime</i>, i.e.&nbsp;\(\gcd(9, 11) = 1\).<div>If the modulus itself is prime then it always works and the order of the element can be used to reduce the exponent as&nbsp;\(9^{11-1} = 1\)&nbsp;by FLT.</div>
Tags: PlsFix::RenderErrors ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::3._The_Structure_of_Groups::8._The_Group_Zₘ*_and_Euler's_Function

Note 5: ETH::DiskMat

Deck: ETH::DiskMat
Note Type: Cloze (with MathJax)
GUID: hx=y:u%$sF
modified

Before

Front

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::3._The_Structure_of_Groups::5._Cyclic_Groups PlsFix::NiklasWTHman

Front

By what can we reduce the exponent of an element in a finite order Group?

Back

In a group \(G\) of finite order, for \(a \in G\): \[a^m = a^{{{c1::R_{\text{ord}(a)}(m)}}}\]

This holds because {{c2::\(a^m = a^{m + \text{ord}(a)} = a^m \cdot a^{\text{ord}(a)} = a^m \cdot e = a^m\)}}.

Back

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::3._The_Structure_of_Groups::5._Cyclic_Groups PlsFix::NiklasWTHman

Front

By what can we reduce the exponent of an element in a finite order Group?

Back

In a group \(G\) of finite order, for \(a \in G\): \[a^m = a^{{{c1::R_{\text{ord}(a)}(m)}}}\]

This holds because {{c2::\(a^m = a^{m + \text{ord}(a)} = a^m \cdot a^{\text{ord}(a)} = a^m \cdot e = a^m\)}}.

After

Front

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::3._The_Structure_of_Groups::5._Cyclic_Groups

By what can we reduce the exponent of an element in a finite order Group?

Back

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::3._The_Structure_of_Groups::5._Cyclic_Groups

By what can we reduce the exponent of an element in a finite order Group?


In a group \(G\) of finite order, for \(a \in G\): \[a^m = a^{R_{\text{ord}(a)}(m)}\]

This holds because:

 \(a^m = a^{m + \text{ord}(a)} = a^m \cdot a^{\text{ord}(a)} = a^m \cdot e = a^m\).

Field-by-field Comparison
Field Before After
Text <h1>Front</h1> <p>By what can we reduce the exponent of an element in a <strong>finite order</strong> Group?</p> <h1>Back</h1> <p>In a group \(G\) of finite order, for \(a \in G\): \[a^m = a^{{{c1::R_{\text{ord}(a)}(m)}}}\]</p> <p>This holds because {{c2::\(a^m = a^{m + \text{ord}(a)} = a^m \cdot a^{\text{ord}(a)} = a^m \cdot e = a^m\)}}.</p> <p>By what can we reduce the exponent of an element in a <strong>finite order</strong> Group?</p>
Extra <p>In a group \(G\) of finite order, for \(a \in G\): \[a^m = a^{R_{\text{ord}(a)}(m)}\]</p> <p>This holds because:</p><p>&nbsp;\(a^m = a^{m + \text{ord}(a)} = a^m \cdot a^{\text{ord}(a)} = a^m \cdot e = a^m\).</p>
Tags: PlsFix::NiklasWTHman ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::3._The_Structure_of_Groups::5._Cyclic_Groups

Note 6: ETH::DiskMat

Deck: ETH::DiskMat
Note Type: Cloze (with MathJax)
GUID: sxW-Trt$`+
modified

Before

Front

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::3._The_Structure_of_Groups::8._The_Group_Zₘ*_and_Euler's_Function PlsFix::NiklasWTHman

Front

\(\mathbb{Z}_m^*\) is defined as?

Back

\[ \overset{\text{def}}{=} \ \{a \in \mathbb{Z}_m \ | \ \gcd(a, m) = 1\} \]

This is the set of all elements in \(\mathbb{Z}_m\) that are coprime to \(m\).

Back

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::3._The_Structure_of_Groups::8._The_Group_Zₘ*_and_Euler's_Function PlsFix::NiklasWTHman

Front

\(\mathbb{Z}_m^*\) is defined as?

Back

\[ \overset{\text{def}}{=} \ \{a \in \mathbb{Z}_m \ | \ \gcd(a, m) = 1\} \]

This is the set of all elements in \(\mathbb{Z}_m\) that are coprime to \(m\).

After

Front

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::3._The_Structure_of_Groups::8._The_Group_Zₘ*_and_Euler's_Function

\(\mathbb{Z}_m^*\) is defined as?

Back

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::3._The_Structure_of_Groups::8._The_Group_Zₘ*_and_Euler's_Function

\(\mathbb{Z}_m^*\) is defined as?


\[ \overset{\text{def}}{=} \ \{a \in \mathbb{Z}_m \ | \ \gcd(a, m) = 1\} \]

This is the set of all elements in \(\mathbb{Z}_m\) that are coprime to \(m\).

Field-by-field Comparison
Field Before After
Text <h1>Front</h1> <p>\(\mathbb{Z}_m^*\) is defined as?</p> <h1>Back</h1> <p>\[ \overset{\text{def}}{=} \ \{a \in \mathbb{Z}_m \ | \ \gcd(a, m) = 1\} \]</p> <p>This is the set of all elements in \(\mathbb{Z}_m\) that are {{c2::coprime}} to \(m\).</p> <p>\(\mathbb{Z}_m^*\) is defined as?</p>
Extra <p>\[ \overset{\text{def}}{=} \ \{a \in \mathbb{Z}_m \ | \ \gcd(a, m) = 1\} \]</p> <p>This is the set of all elements in \(\mathbb{Z}_m\) that are coprime to \(m\).</p>
Tags: PlsFix::NiklasWTHman ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::3._The_Structure_of_Groups::8._The_Group_Zₘ*_and_Euler's_Function

Note 7: ETH::DiskMat

Deck: ETH::DiskMat
Note Type: Cloze (with MathJax)
GUID: G&Y|dtr7^k
modified

Before

Front

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::3._The_Structure_of_Groups::8._The_Group_Zₘ*_and_Euler's_Function PlsFix::NiklasWTHman

Front

If the prime factorization of \(m\) is \(m = \prod_{i=1}^r p_i^{e_i}\) then \(\varphi(m)\) is?

Back

\[\varphi(m) = \prod_{i=1}^r (p_i - 1)p_i^{e_i - 1}\]

For a prime \(p\) and \(e \geq 1\): \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]

This comes from the fact that for prime \(p\) and \(e \geq 1\) we have \[ \varphi(p^e) = p^{e-1}(p - 1) \]since exactly every \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]0th integer in \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]1 contains a factor \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]2 and thus \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]3 elements don't contain a factor \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]4, i.e. are in \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]5.
Since the \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]6's are pairwise relatively prime (obviously) by the CRT we have that \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]7. This holds as the CRT allows us to establish a bijection between each \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]8 and a unique tuple \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]9 where \[ \varphi(p^e) = p^{e-1}(p - 1) \]0.

Back

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::3._The_Structure_of_Groups::8._The_Group_Zₘ*_and_Euler's_Function PlsFix::NiklasWTHman

Front

If the prime factorization of \(m\) is \(m = \prod_{i=1}^r p_i^{e_i}\) then \(\varphi(m)\) is?

Back

\[\varphi(m) = \prod_{i=1}^r (p_i - 1)p_i^{e_i - 1}\]

For a prime \(p\) and \(e \geq 1\): \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]

This comes from the fact that for prime \(p\) and \(e \geq 1\) we have \[ \varphi(p^e) = p^{e-1}(p - 1) \]since exactly every \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]0th integer in \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]1 contains a factor \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]2 and thus \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]3 elements don't contain a factor \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]4, i.e. are in \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]5.
Since the \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]6's are pairwise relatively prime (obviously) by the CRT we have that \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]7. This holds as the CRT allows us to establish a bijection between each \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]8 and a unique tuple \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]9 where \[ \varphi(p^e) = p^{e-1}(p - 1) \]0.

After

Front

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::3._The_Structure_of_Groups::8._The_Group_Zₘ*_and_Euler's_Function

If the prime factorization of \(m\) is \(m = \prod_{i=1}^r p_i^{e_i}\) then \(\varphi(m)\) is?

Back

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::3._The_Structure_of_Groups::8._The_Group_Zₘ*_and_Euler's_Function

If the prime factorization of \(m\) is \(m = \prod_{i=1}^r p_i^{e_i}\) then \(\varphi(m)\) is?


For a prime and  :\[\varphi(m) = \prod_{i=1}^r (p_i - 1)p_i^{e_i - 1}\]

Field-by-field Comparison
Field Before After
Text <h1>Front</h1> <p>If the prime factorization of \(m\) is \(m = \prod_{i=1}^r p_i^{e_i}\) then \(\varphi(m)\) is?</p> <h1>Back</h1> <p>\[\varphi(m) = \prod_{i=1}^r (p_i - 1)p_i^{e_i - 1}\]</p> <p>For a prime \(p\) and \(e \geq 1\): \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]</p> <p>This comes from the fact that for prime \(p\) and \(e \geq 1\) we have \[ \varphi(p^e) = p^{e-1}(p - 1) \]since exactly every \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]0th integer in \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]1 contains a factor \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]2 and thus \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]3 elements don't contain a factor \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]4, i.e. are in \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]5.<br> Since the \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]6's are pairwise relatively prime (obviously) by the CRT we have that \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]7. This holds as the CRT allows us to establish a bijection between each \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]8 and a unique tuple \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]9 where \[ \varphi(p^e) = p^{e-1}(p - 1) \]0.</p> <p>If the prime factorization of \(m\) is \(m = \prod_{i=1}^r p_i^{e_i}\) then \(\varphi(m)\) is?</p>
Extra <p>For a prime&nbsp;and&nbsp;&nbsp;:\[\varphi(m) = \prod_{i=1}^r (p_i - 1)p_i^{e_i - 1}\]<br></p>
Tags: PlsFix::NiklasWTHman ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::3._The_Structure_of_Groups::8._The_Group_Zₘ*_and_Euler's_Function

Note 8: ETH::DiskMat

Deck: ETH::DiskMat
Note Type: Basic (with MathJax)
GUID: s>%Mz^.26_
modified

Before

Front

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::5._Rings_and_Fields::4._Zerodivisors_and_Integral_Domains PlsFix::RenderErrors

Name a zerodivisor in a Ring.

Back

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::5._Rings_and_Fields::4._Zerodivisors_and_Integral_Domains PlsFix::RenderErrors

Name a zerodivisor in a Ring.


\(2\) is a zerodivisor of \(\mathbb_{Z}_4\), as \(2*2 = 0\).

After

Front

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::5._Rings_and_Fields::4._Zerodivisors_and_Integral_Domains

Name a zerodivisor in a Ring.

Back

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::5._Rings_and_Fields::4._Zerodivisors_and_Integral_Domains

Name a zerodivisor in a Ring.


\(2\) is a zerodivisor of \(\mathbb{Z}_4\), as \(2*2 = 0\).

Field-by-field Comparison
Field Before After
Back <p>\(2\) is a zerodivisor of \(\mathbb_{Z}_4\), as \(2*2 = 0\).</p> <p>\(2\) is a zerodivisor of \(\mathbb{Z}_4\), as \(2*2 = 0\).</p>
Tags: PlsFix::RenderErrors ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::5._Rings_and_Fields::4._Zerodivisors_and_Integral_Domains

Note 9: ETH::DiskMat

Deck: ETH::DiskMat
Note Type: Basic (with MathJax)
GUID: wJ,ON3lFCv
modified

Before

Front

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::8._Finite_Fields::2._Constructing_Extension_Fields PlsFix::RenderErrors

Give an example of an extension field constructed from polynomials.

Back

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::8._Finite_Fields::2._Constructing_Extension_Fields PlsFix::RenderErrors

Give an example of an extension field constructed from polynomials.


\(\mathbb{R}[x]_{x^2+1}\) is a field, isomorphic to \(\mathbb{C\) (the complex numbers).

Explanation: \(x^2 + 1\) is irreducible over \(\mathbb{R}\) (no real roots). Elements of \(\mathbb{R}[x]_{x^2+1}\) are of the form \(a + bx\) where \(x^2 = -1\), which corresponds exactly to complex numbers \(a + bi\).

There are no other extension fields on \(\mathbb{R}\) that aren't isomorphic to \(\mathbb{C}\).

After

Front

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::8._Finite_Fields::2._Constructing_Extension_Fields

Give an example of an extension field constructed from polynomials.

Back

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::8._Finite_Fields::2._Constructing_Extension_Fields

Give an example of an extension field constructed from polynomials.


\(\mathbb{R}[x]_{x^2+1}\) is a field, isomorphic to \(\mathbb{C}\) (the complex numbers).

Explanation: \(x^2 + 1\) is irreducible over \(\mathbb{R}\) (no real roots). Elements of \(\mathbb{R}[x]_{x^2+1}\) are of the form \(a + bx\) where \(x^2 = -1\), which corresponds exactly to complex numbers \(a + bi\).

There are no other extension fields on \(\mathbb{R}\) that aren't isomorphic to \(\mathbb{C}\).

Field-by-field Comparison
Field Before After
Back <p>\(\mathbb{R}[x]_{x^2+1}\) is a field, <strong>isomorphic to \(\mathbb{C\)</strong> (the complex numbers).</p> <p><strong>Explanation</strong>: \(x^2 + 1\) is irreducible over \(\mathbb{R}\) (no real roots). Elements of \(\mathbb{R}[x]_{x^2+1}\) are of the form \(a + bx\) where \(x^2 = -1\), which corresponds exactly to complex numbers \(a + bi\).</p> <p>There are no other extension fields on \(\mathbb{R}\) that aren't isomorphic to \(\mathbb{C}\).</p> <p>\(\mathbb{R}[x]_{x^2+1}\) is a field, <strong>isomorphic to \(\mathbb{C}\)</strong> (the complex numbers).</p> <p><strong>Explanation</strong>: \(x^2 + 1\) is irreducible over \(\mathbb{R}\) (no real roots). Elements of \(\mathbb{R}[x]_{x^2+1}\) are of the form \(a + bx\) where \(x^2 = -1\), which corresponds exactly to complex numbers \(a + bi\).</p> <p>There are no other extension fields on \(\mathbb{R}\) that aren't isomorphic to \(\mathbb{C}\).</p>
Tags: PlsFix::RenderErrors ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::8._Finite_Fields::2._Constructing_Extension_Fields

Note 10: ETH::DiskMat

Deck: ETH::DiskMat
Note Type: Cloze (with MathJax)
GUID: jTx~;>i=Aw
modified

Before

Front

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::9._Application:_Error-Correcting_Codes::1._Definition_of_Error-Correcting_Codes PlsFix::RenderErrors

An encoding function maps \(k\) information symbols to $n encoded symbols.

Back

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::9._Application:_Error-Correcting_Codes::1._Definition_of_Error-Correcting_Codes PlsFix::RenderErrors

An encoding function maps \(k\) information symbols to $n encoded symbols.

After

Front

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::9._Application:_Error-Correcting_Codes::1._Definition_of_Error-Correcting_Codes

An encoding function maps \(k\) information symbols to \(n\) encoded symbols.

Back

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::9._Application:_Error-Correcting_Codes::1._Definition_of_Error-Correcting_Codes

An encoding function maps \(k\) information symbols to \(n\) encoded symbols.

Field-by-field Comparison
Field Before After
Text <p>An encoding function maps {{c1::\(k\) information symbols}} to ${{c3::n encoded symbols}}.</p> <p>An encoding function maps {{c1::\(k\) information symbols}} to {{c3::\(n\)&nbsp;encoded symbols}}.</p>
Tags: PlsFix::RenderErrors ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::9._Application:_Error-Correcting_Codes::1._Definition_of_Error-Correcting_Codes

Note 11: ETH::DiskMat

Deck: ETH::DiskMat
Note Type: Basic (with MathJax)
GUID: A9?srsv3Y:
modified

Before

Front

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::9._Application:_Error-Correcting_Codes::1._Definition_of_Error-Correcting_Codes PlsFix::RenderErrors

What is the \((n, k)\)-error correcting code over the alphabet \(\mathcal{A}\) with $|\mathcal{A}| = q?

Back

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::9._Application:_Error-Correcting_Codes::1._Definition_of_Error-Correcting_Codes PlsFix::RenderErrors

What is the \((n, k)\)-error correcting code over the alphabet \(\mathcal{A}\) with $|\mathcal{A}| = q?


It's a subset of \(\mathcal{A}^n\) of cardinality \(q^k\).

After

Front

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::9._Application:_Error-Correcting_Codes::1._Definition_of_Error-Correcting_Codes

What is the \((n, k)\)-error correcting code over the alphabet \(\mathcal{A}\) with \(|\mathcal{A}| = q\)?

Back

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::9._Application:_Error-Correcting_Codes::1._Definition_of_Error-Correcting_Codes

What is the \((n, k)\)-error correcting code over the alphabet \(\mathcal{A}\) with \(|\mathcal{A}| = q\)?


It's a subset of \(\mathcal{A}^n\) of cardinality \(q^k\).

Field-by-field Comparison
Field Before After
Front <p>What is the \((n, k)\)-error correcting code over the alphabet \(\mathcal{A}\) with $|\mathcal{A}| = q?</p> <p>What is the \((n, k)\)-error correcting code over the alphabet \(\mathcal{A}\) with \(|\mathcal{A}| = q\)?</p>
Tags: PlsFix::RenderErrors ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::9._Application:_Error-Correcting_Codes::1._Definition_of_Error-Correcting_Codes

Note 12: ETH::DiskMat

Deck: ETH::DiskMat
Note Type: Cloze (with MathJax)
GUID: AR?8CyMux0
deleted

Deleted Note

Front

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::5._Rings_and_Fields::5._Polynomial_Rings PlsFix::NiklasWTHman

Front

What is a polynomial over a commutative ring?

Back

A polynomial \(a(x)\) over a commutative ring \(R\) in the indeterminate \(x\) is a formal expression of the form: \[ a(x) = {{c2::a_d x^d + a_{d-1}x^{d-1} + \cdots + a_1 x + a_0}} = \sum_{i=0}^d a_i x^i \] for some non-negative integer \(d\), with \(a_i \in R\).

The set of polynomials in \(x\) over \(R\) is denoted \(R[x]\).

Back

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::5._Rings_and_Fields::5._Polynomial_Rings PlsFix::NiklasWTHman

Front

What is a polynomial over a commutative ring?

Back

A polynomial \(a(x)\) over a commutative ring \(R\) in the indeterminate \(x\) is a formal expression of the form: \[ a(x) = {{c2::a_d x^d + a_{d-1}x^{d-1} + \cdots + a_1 x + a_0}} = \sum_{i=0}^d a_i x^i \] for some non-negative integer \(d\), with \(a_i \in R\).

The set of polynomials in \(x\) over \(R\) is denoted \(R[x]\).

Current

Note has been deleted

Field-by-field Comparison
Field Before After
Text <h1>Front</h1> <p>What is a polynomial over a commutative ring?</p> <h1>Back</h1> <p>A polynomial \(a(x)\) over a commutative ring \(R\) in the indeterminate \(x\) is a formal expression of the form: \[ a(x) = {{c2::a_d x^d + a_{d-1}x^{d-1} + \cdots + a_1 x + a_0}} = \sum_{i=0}^d a_i x^i \] for some non-negative integer \(d\), with \(a_i \in R\).</p> <p>The set of polynomials in \(x\) over \(R\) is denoted {{c4::\(R[x]\)}}.</p>
Tags: ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::5._Rings_and_Fields::5._Polynomial_Rings PlsFix::NiklasWTHman

Note 13: ETH::DiskMat

Deck: ETH::DiskMat
Note Type: Cloze (with MathJax)
GUID: lq:b}[Y<9t
deleted

Deleted Note

Front

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::7._Polynomials_as_Functions::3._Polynomial_Interpolation PlsFix::NiklasWTHman

Front

Lagrange Interpolation for polynomials in a Field

Back

Let \(\beta_i = a(\alpha_i)\) for \(i = 1, \dots, d+1\).

Then \(a(x)\) is given by Lagrange's Interpolation formula: \[a(x) = \sum_{i=1}^{d+1} \beta_i u_i(x)\] where the polynomial \(u_i(x)\) is: \[u_i(x) = \frac{{{c2::(x - \alpha_1) \cdots (x - \alpha_{i-1})(x - \alpha_{i+1}) \cdots (x - \alpha_{d+1})}}}{{{c3::(\alpha_i - \alpha_1) \cdots (\alpha_i - \alpha_{i-1})(\alpha_i - \alpha_{i+1}) \cdots (\alpha_i - \alpha_{d+1})}}}\]

Note that for \(u_i(x)\) to be well-defined, all constant terms \(\alpha_i - \alpha_j\) in the denominator must be invertible. This is guaranteed in a field since \(a_i - a_j \neq 0\) for \(i \neq j\) (as they are all distinct).

Back

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::7._Polynomials_as_Functions::3._Polynomial_Interpolation PlsFix::NiklasWTHman

Front

Lagrange Interpolation for polynomials in a Field

Back

Let \(\beta_i = a(\alpha_i)\) for \(i = 1, \dots, d+1\).

Then \(a(x)\) is given by Lagrange's Interpolation formula: \[a(x) = \sum_{i=1}^{d+1} \beta_i u_i(x)\] where the polynomial \(u_i(x)\) is: \[u_i(x) = \frac{{{c2::(x - \alpha_1) \cdots (x - \alpha_{i-1})(x - \alpha_{i+1}) \cdots (x - \alpha_{d+1})}}}{{{c3::(\alpha_i - \alpha_1) \cdots (\alpha_i - \alpha_{i-1})(\alpha_i - \alpha_{i+1}) \cdots (\alpha_i - \alpha_{d+1})}}}\]

Note that for \(u_i(x)\) to be well-defined, all constant terms \(\alpha_i - \alpha_j\) in the denominator must be invertible. This is guaranteed in a field since \(a_i - a_j \neq 0\) for \(i \neq j\) (as they are all distinct).

Current

Note has been deleted

Field-by-field Comparison
Field Before After
Text <h1>Front</h1> <p>Lagrange Interpolation for polynomials in a Field</p> <h1>Back</h1> <p>Let \(\beta_i = a(\alpha_i)\) for \(i = 1, \dots, d+1\).</p> <p>Then \(a(x)\) is given by Lagrange's Interpolation formula: \[a(x) = \sum_{i=1}^{d+1} \beta_i u_i(x)\] where the polynomial \(u_i(x)\) is: \[u_i(x) = \frac{{{c2::(x - \alpha_1) \cdots (x - \alpha_{i-1})(x - \alpha_{i+1}) \cdots (x - \alpha_{d+1})}}}{{{c3::(\alpha_i - \alpha_1) \cdots (\alpha_i - \alpha_{i-1})(\alpha_i - \alpha_{i+1}) \cdots (\alpha_i - \alpha_{d+1})}}}\]</p> <p>Note that for \(u_i(x)\) to be well-defined, all constant terms \(\alpha_i - \alpha_j\) in the denominator must be invertible. This is guaranteed in a field since \(a_i - a_j \neq 0\) for \(i \neq j\) (as they are all distinct).</p>
Tags: ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::7._Polynomials_as_Functions::3._Polynomial_Interpolation PlsFix::NiklasWTHman

Note 14: ETH::DiskMat

Deck: ETH::DiskMat
Note Type: Cloze (with MathJax)
GUID: y`5($Q$d37
deleted

Deleted Note

Front

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::2._Monoids_and_Groups::3._Inverses_and_Groups
Eine Gruppe ist eine Menge \(G\) mit Operation \( * \) mit folgenden Eigenschaften:
    {{c2::
  • Assoziativität: \((a * b) * c = a * (b*c)\)
  • Neutrales Element existiert: \( a * e = e * a = a \)
  • Jedes Element \(a\in G\) hat eine Inverse: \( a * a^{-1} = a^{-1} * a = e\)
  • }}

Back

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::2._Monoids_and_Groups::3._Inverses_and_Groups
Eine Gruppe ist eine Menge \(G\) mit Operation \( * \) mit folgenden Eigenschaften:
    {{c2::
  • Assoziativität: \((a * b) * c = a * (b*c)\)
  • Neutrales Element existiert: \( a * e = e * a = a \)
  • Jedes Element \(a\in G\) hat eine Inverse: \( a * a^{-1} = a^{-1} * a = e\)
  • }}

Current

Note has been deleted

Field-by-field Comparison
Field Before After
Text {{c1::Eine Gruppe}} ist eine {{c1::Menge \(G\) mit Operation&nbsp;\( * \)}} mit folgenden Eigenschaften:<ul>{{c2::<li> Assoziativität:&nbsp;\((a * b) * c = a * (b*c)\)</li><li>Neutrales Element existiert:&nbsp;\( a * e = e * a = a \)</li><li>Jedes Element \(a\in G\) hat eine Inverse:&nbsp;\( a * a^{-1} = a^{-1} * a = e\)</li>}}<br></ul>
Tags: ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::2._Monoids_and_Groups::3._Inverses_and_Groups

Note 15: ETH::DiskMat

Deck: ETH::DiskMat
Note Type: Cloze (with MathJax)
GUID: BG+yKyLb,^
deleted

Deleted Note

Front

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::5._Rings_and_Fields::1._Definition_of_a_Ring
Ein Körper ist eine Menge {{c1::\( \mathbb{K}\) mit Operationen \(+ , *\)}} mit folgenden Eigenschaften:
{{c2::
- \( (\mathbb{K}, +)\) ist eine abelsche Gruppe
- \( (\mathbb{K} \backslash \{0\}, *)\) ist eine abelsche Gruppe
- Distributivität: \( a * (b+c) = a*b + a*c\)
}}

Back

ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::5._Rings_and_Fields::1._Definition_of_a_Ring
Ein Körper ist eine Menge {{c1::\( \mathbb{K}\) mit Operationen \(+ , *\)}} mit folgenden Eigenschaften:
{{c2::
- \( (\mathbb{K}, +)\) ist eine abelsche Gruppe
- \( (\mathbb{K} \backslash \{0\}, *)\) ist eine abelsche Gruppe
- Distributivität: \( a * (b+c) = a*b + a*c\)
}}

Beispiel: \( \mathbb{Q}, \mathbb{R}\)

Current

Note has been deleted

Field-by-field Comparison
Field Before After
Text {{c1::Ein Körper}} ist eine Menge&nbsp;{{c1::\( \mathbb{K}\) mit Operationen&nbsp;\(+ , *\)}} mit folgenden Eigenschaften:<div>{{c2::<div>-&nbsp;\( (\mathbb{K}, +)\) ist eine abelsche Gruppe</div><div>-&nbsp;\( (\mathbb{K} \backslash \{0\}, *)\) ist eine abelsche Gruppe</div><div>- Distributivität:&nbsp;\( a * (b+c) = a*b + a*c\)</div>}}<br></div>
Extra Beispiel:&nbsp;\( \mathbb{Q}, \mathbb{R}\)
Tags: ETH::1._Semester::DiskMat::5._Algebra::5._Rings_and_Fields::1._Definition_of_a_Ring
↑ Top