Note 1: ETH::DiskMat
Note Type: Basic (with MathJax)
GUID:
LWf)m2..vK
Before
Front
Back
After
Front
Back
- Reflexive
- Symmetric
- Transitive
Field-by-field Comparison
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Back | <ol><li><span><b>Reflexive</b></span></li><li><b>Symmetric</b></li><li><b>Transitive</b></li></ol> |
Note 2: ETH::DiskMat
Note Type: Basic (with MathJax)
GUID:
K>1Kv;vQr=
Before
Front
Back
After
Front
Back
Field-by-field Comparison
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Back | Because \(\{2, 3\} \not\subseteq \{3, |
Because \(\{2, 3\} \not\subseteq \{3, 1\}\) and \(\{3, 1\} \not\subseteq \{2, 3\}\) (they are incomparable). |
Note 3: ETH::DiskMat
Note Type: Basic (with MathJax)
GUID:
jAR2Tu9;l8
Before
Front
Back
It's only allowed when the formula is actually a tautology (or unsatisfiable), i.e. true or false under all interpretations!
For example, in $U = \mathbb{N}$, $x \geq 0 \land x = 5 \implies \top \land x = 5 \implies x = 5$ but this is wrong as $x \geq 0$ is only equivalent to $\top$ in this specific universe. We instead can just write the implication directly.
After
Front
Back
It's only allowed when the formula is actually a tautology (or unsatisfiable), i.e. true or false under all interpretations!
For example, in \(U = \mathbb{N}\), \(x \geq 0 \land x = 5 \implies \top \land x = 5 \implies x = 5\) but this is wrong as \(x \geq 0\) is only equivalent to \(\top\) in this specific universe. We instead can just write the implication directly.
Field-by-field Comparison
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Back | We are not allowed to use |
We are not allowed to use \(\top\) or \(\perp\) in formulas, to replace statement that are <b>true</b> or <b>false</b> under our interpretation.<br><br>It's only allowed when the formula is actually a tautology (or unsatisfiable), i.e. true or false under <b>all</b> interpretations!<br><br>For example, in \(U = \mathbb{N}\), \(x \geq 0 \land x = 5 \implies \top \land x = 5 \implies x = 5\) but this is wrong as \(x \geq 0\) is only equivalent to \(\top\) in this specific universe. We instead can just write the implication directly. |
Note 4: ETH::DiskMat
Note Type: Basic (with MathJax)
GUID:
E7<;U^~bFt
Before
Front
Back
For this to work however, we need the *number and the order of the group* (modulo remainder) to be *coprime*, i.e. $\gcd(9, 11) = 1$.
After
Front
Back
For this to work however, we need the *number and the order of the group* (modulo remainder) to be coprime, i.e. \(\gcd(9, 11) = 1\).
Field-by-field Comparison
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Back | As |
As \(9^{10} \equiv_{11} 1\) (see Fermat little theorem and 11 prime), we can reduce the exponent modulo $10$ (see Lagrange's theorem in chapter 5). Thus \(R_{11}(9^{2024}) = R_{11}(9^{4}) = R_{11}(-2^{4}) = 5\).<br><br>For this to work however, we need the *number and the order of the group* (modulo remainder) to be <i>coprime</i>, i.e. \(\gcd(9, 11) = 1\).<div>If the modulus itself is prime then it always works and the order of the element can be used to reduce the exponent as \(9^{11-1} = 1\) by FLT.</div> |
Note 5: ETH::DiskMat
Note Type: Cloze (with MathJax)
GUID:
hx=y:u%$sF
Before
Front
Front
By what can we reduce the exponent of an element in a finite order Group?
Back
In a group \(G\) of finite order, for \(a \in G\): \[a^m = a^{{{c1::R_{\text{ord}(a)}(m)}}}\]
This holds because {{c2::\(a^m = a^{m + \text{ord}(a)} = a^m \cdot a^{\text{ord}(a)} = a^m \cdot e = a^m\)}}.
Back
Front
By what can we reduce the exponent of an element in a finite order Group?
Back
In a group \(G\) of finite order, for \(a \in G\): \[a^m = a^{{{c1::R_{\text{ord}(a)}(m)}}}\]
This holds because {{c2::\(a^m = a^{m + \text{ord}(a)} = a^m \cdot a^{\text{ord}(a)} = a^m \cdot e = a^m\)}}.
After
Front
By what can we reduce the exponent of an element in a finite order Group?
Back
By what can we reduce the exponent of an element in a finite order Group?
In a group \(G\) of finite order, for \(a \in G\): \[a^m = a^{R_{\text{ord}(a)}(m)}\]
This holds because:
\(a^m = a^{m + \text{ord}(a)} = a^m \cdot a^{\text{ord}(a)} = a^m \cdot e = a^m\).
Field-by-field Comparison
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Text | <p>By what can we reduce the exponent of an element in a <strong>finite order</strong> Group?</p> | |
| Extra | <p>In a group \(G\) of finite order, for \(a \in G\): \[a^m = a^{R_{\text{ord}(a)}(m)}\]</p> <p>This holds because:</p><p> \(a^m = a^{m + \text{ord}(a)} = a^m \cdot a^{\text{ord}(a)} = a^m \cdot e = a^m\).</p> |
Note 6: ETH::DiskMat
Note Type: Cloze (with MathJax)
GUID:
sxW-Trt$`+
Before
Front
Front
\(\mathbb{Z}_m^*\) is defined as?
Back
\[ \overset{\text{def}}{=} \ \{a \in \mathbb{Z}_m \ | \ \gcd(a, m) = 1\} \]
This is the set of all elements in \(\mathbb{Z}_m\) that are coprime to \(m\).
Back
Front
\(\mathbb{Z}_m^*\) is defined as?
Back
\[ \overset{\text{def}}{=} \ \{a \in \mathbb{Z}_m \ | \ \gcd(a, m) = 1\} \]
This is the set of all elements in \(\mathbb{Z}_m\) that are coprime to \(m\).
After
Front
\(\mathbb{Z}_m^*\) is defined as?
Back
\(\mathbb{Z}_m^*\) is defined as?
\[ \overset{\text{def}}{=} \ \{a \in \mathbb{Z}_m \ | \ \gcd(a, m) = 1\} \]
This is the set of all elements in \(\mathbb{Z}_m\) that are coprime to \(m\).
Field-by-field Comparison
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Text | <p>\(\mathbb{Z}_m^*\) is defined as?</p> | |
| Extra | <p>\[ \overset{\text{def}}{=} \ \{a \in \mathbb{Z}_m \ | \ \gcd(a, m) = 1\} \]</p> <p>This is the set of all elements in \(\mathbb{Z}_m\) that are coprime to \(m\).</p> |
Note 7: ETH::DiskMat
Note Type: Cloze (with MathJax)
GUID:
G&Y|dtr7^k
Before
Front
Front
If the prime factorization of \(m\) is \(m = \prod_{i=1}^r p_i^{e_i}\) then \(\varphi(m)\) is?
Back
\[\varphi(m) = \prod_{i=1}^r (p_i - 1)p_i^{e_i - 1}\]
For a prime \(p\) and \(e \geq 1\): \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]
This comes from the fact that for prime \(p\) and \(e \geq 1\) we have \[ \varphi(p^e) = p^{e-1}(p - 1) \]since exactly every \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]0th integer in \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]1 contains a factor \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]2 and thus \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]3 elements don't contain a factor \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]4, i.e. are in \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]5.
Since the \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]6's are pairwise relatively prime (obviously) by the CRT we have that \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]7. This holds as the CRT allows us to establish a bijection between each \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]8 and a unique tuple \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]9 where \[ \varphi(p^e) = p^{e-1}(p - 1) \]0.
Back
Front
If the prime factorization of \(m\) is \(m = \prod_{i=1}^r p_i^{e_i}\) then \(\varphi(m)\) is?
Back
\[\varphi(m) = \prod_{i=1}^r (p_i - 1)p_i^{e_i - 1}\]
For a prime \(p\) and \(e \geq 1\): \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]
This comes from the fact that for prime \(p\) and \(e \geq 1\) we have \[ \varphi(p^e) = p^{e-1}(p - 1) \]since exactly every \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]0th integer in \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]1 contains a factor \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]2 and thus \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]3 elements don't contain a factor \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]4, i.e. are in \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]5.
Since the \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]6's are pairwise relatively prime (obviously) by the CRT we have that \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]7. This holds as the CRT allows us to establish a bijection between each \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]8 and a unique tuple \[\varphi(p^e) = {{c2::p^{e-1}(p-1)}}\]9 where \[ \varphi(p^e) = p^{e-1}(p - 1) \]0.
After
Front
If the prime factorization of \(m\) is \(m = \prod_{i=1}^r p_i^{e_i}\) then \(\varphi(m)\) is?
Back
If the prime factorization of \(m\) is \(m = \prod_{i=1}^r p_i^{e_i}\) then \(\varphi(m)\) is?
For a prime and :\[\varphi(m) = \prod_{i=1}^r (p_i - 1)p_i^{e_i - 1}\]
Field-by-field Comparison
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Text | <p>If the prime factorization of \(m\) is \(m = \prod_{i=1}^r p_i^{e_i}\) then \(\varphi(m)\) is?</p> | |
| Extra | <p>For a prime and :\[\varphi(m) = \prod_{i=1}^r (p_i - 1)p_i^{e_i - 1}\]<br></p> |
Note 8: ETH::DiskMat
Note Type: Basic (with MathJax)
GUID:
s>%Mz^.26_
Before
Front
Name a zerodivisor in a Ring.
Back
Name a zerodivisor in a Ring.
\(2\) is a zerodivisor of \(\mathbb_{Z}_4\), as \(2*2 = 0\).
After
Front
Name a zerodivisor in a Ring.
Back
Name a zerodivisor in a Ring.
\(2\) is a zerodivisor of \(\mathbb{Z}_4\), as \(2*2 = 0\).
Field-by-field Comparison
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Back | <p>\(2\) is a zerodivisor of \(\mathbb |
<p>\(2\) is a zerodivisor of \(\mathbb{Z}_4\), as \(2*2 = 0\).</p> |
Note 9: ETH::DiskMat
Note Type: Basic (with MathJax)
GUID:
wJ,ON3lFCv
Before
Front
Give an example of an extension field constructed from polynomials.
Back
Give an example of an extension field constructed from polynomials.
\(\mathbb{R}[x]_{x^2+1}\) is a field, isomorphic to \(\mathbb{C\) (the complex numbers).
Explanation: \(x^2 + 1\) is irreducible over \(\mathbb{R}\) (no real roots). Elements of \(\mathbb{R}[x]_{x^2+1}\) are of the form \(a + bx\) where \(x^2 = -1\), which corresponds exactly to complex numbers \(a + bi\).
There are no other extension fields on \(\mathbb{R}\) that aren't isomorphic to \(\mathbb{C}\).
After
Front
Give an example of an extension field constructed from polynomials.
Back
Give an example of an extension field constructed from polynomials.
\(\mathbb{R}[x]_{x^2+1}\) is a field, isomorphic to \(\mathbb{C}\) (the complex numbers).
Explanation: \(x^2 + 1\) is irreducible over \(\mathbb{R}\) (no real roots). Elements of \(\mathbb{R}[x]_{x^2+1}\) are of the form \(a + bx\) where \(x^2 = -1\), which corresponds exactly to complex numbers \(a + bi\).
There are no other extension fields on \(\mathbb{R}\) that aren't isomorphic to \(\mathbb{C}\).
Field-by-field Comparison
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Back | <p>\(\mathbb{R}[x]_{x^2+1}\) is a field, <strong>isomorphic to \(\mathbb{C\)</strong> (the complex numbers).</p> <p><strong>Explanation</strong>: \(x^2 + 1\) is irreducible over \(\mathbb{R}\) (no real roots). Elements of \(\mathbb{R}[x]_{x^2+1}\) are of the form \(a + bx\) where \(x^2 = -1\), which corresponds exactly to complex numbers \(a + bi\).</p> <p>There are no other extension fields on \(\mathbb{R}\) that aren't isomorphic to \(\mathbb{C}\).</p> | <p>\(\mathbb{R}[x]_{x^2+1}\) is a field, <strong>isomorphic to \(\mathbb{C}\)</strong> (the complex numbers).</p> <p><strong>Explanation</strong>: \(x^2 + 1\) is irreducible over \(\mathbb{R}\) (no real roots). Elements of \(\mathbb{R}[x]_{x^2+1}\) are of the form \(a + bx\) where \(x^2 = -1\), which corresponds exactly to complex numbers \(a + bi\).</p> <p>There are no other extension fields on \(\mathbb{R}\) that aren't isomorphic to \(\mathbb{C}\).</p> |
Note 10: ETH::DiskMat
Note Type: Cloze (with MathJax)
GUID:
jTx~;>i=Aw
Before
Front
An encoding function maps \(k\) information symbols to $n encoded symbols.
Back
An encoding function maps \(k\) information symbols to $n encoded symbols.
After
Front
An encoding function maps \(k\) information symbols to \(n\) encoded symbols.
Back
An encoding function maps \(k\) information symbols to \(n\) encoded symbols.
Field-by-field Comparison
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Text | <p>An encoding function maps {{c1::\(k\) information symbols}} to |
<p>An encoding function maps {{c1::\(k\) information symbols}} to {{c3::\(n\) encoded symbols}}.</p> |
Note 11: ETH::DiskMat
Note Type: Basic (with MathJax)
GUID:
A9?srsv3Y:
Before
Front
What is the \((n, k)\)-error correcting code over the alphabet \(\mathcal{A}\) with $|\mathcal{A}| = q?
Back
What is the \((n, k)\)-error correcting code over the alphabet \(\mathcal{A}\) with $|\mathcal{A}| = q?
It's a subset of \(\mathcal{A}^n\) of cardinality \(q^k\).
After
Front
What is the \((n, k)\)-error correcting code over the alphabet \(\mathcal{A}\) with \(|\mathcal{A}| = q\)?
Back
What is the \((n, k)\)-error correcting code over the alphabet \(\mathcal{A}\) with \(|\mathcal{A}| = q\)?
It's a subset of \(\mathcal{A}^n\) of cardinality \(q^k\).
Field-by-field Comparison
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Front | <p>What is the \((n, k)\)-error correcting code over the alphabet \(\mathcal{A}\) with |
<p>What is the \((n, k)\)-error correcting code over the alphabet \(\mathcal{A}\) with \(|\mathcal{A}| = q\)?</p> |
Note 12: ETH::DiskMat
Note Type: Cloze (with MathJax)
GUID:
AR?8CyMux0
Deleted Note
Front
Front
What is a polynomial over a commutative ring?
Back
A polynomial \(a(x)\) over a commutative ring \(R\) in the indeterminate \(x\) is a formal expression of the form: \[ a(x) = {{c2::a_d x^d + a_{d-1}x^{d-1} + \cdots + a_1 x + a_0}} = \sum_{i=0}^d a_i x^i \] for some non-negative integer \(d\), with \(a_i \in R\).
The set of polynomials in \(x\) over \(R\) is denoted \(R[x]\).
Back
Front
What is a polynomial over a commutative ring?
Back
A polynomial \(a(x)\) over a commutative ring \(R\) in the indeterminate \(x\) is a formal expression of the form: \[ a(x) = {{c2::a_d x^d + a_{d-1}x^{d-1} + \cdots + a_1 x + a_0}} = \sum_{i=0}^d a_i x^i \] for some non-negative integer \(d\), with \(a_i \in R\).
The set of polynomials in \(x\) over \(R\) is denoted \(R[x]\).
Current
Note has been deleted
Field-by-field Comparison
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Text |
Note 13: ETH::DiskMat
Note Type: Cloze (with MathJax)
GUID:
lq:b}[Y<9t
Deleted Note
Front
Front
Lagrange Interpolation for polynomials in a Field
Back
Let \(\beta_i = a(\alpha_i)\) for \(i = 1, \dots, d+1\).
Then \(a(x)\) is given by Lagrange's Interpolation formula: \[a(x) = \sum_{i=1}^{d+1} \beta_i u_i(x)\] where the polynomial \(u_i(x)\) is: \[u_i(x) = \frac{{{c2::(x - \alpha_1) \cdots (x - \alpha_{i-1})(x - \alpha_{i+1}) \cdots (x - \alpha_{d+1})}}}{{{c3::(\alpha_i - \alpha_1) \cdots (\alpha_i - \alpha_{i-1})(\alpha_i - \alpha_{i+1}) \cdots (\alpha_i - \alpha_{d+1})}}}\]
Note that for \(u_i(x)\) to be well-defined, all constant terms \(\alpha_i - \alpha_j\) in the denominator must be invertible. This is guaranteed in a field since \(a_i - a_j \neq 0\) for \(i \neq j\) (as they are all distinct).
Back
Front
Lagrange Interpolation for polynomials in a Field
Back
Let \(\beta_i = a(\alpha_i)\) for \(i = 1, \dots, d+1\).
Then \(a(x)\) is given by Lagrange's Interpolation formula: \[a(x) = \sum_{i=1}^{d+1} \beta_i u_i(x)\] where the polynomial \(u_i(x)\) is: \[u_i(x) = \frac{{{c2::(x - \alpha_1) \cdots (x - \alpha_{i-1})(x - \alpha_{i+1}) \cdots (x - \alpha_{d+1})}}}{{{c3::(\alpha_i - \alpha_1) \cdots (\alpha_i - \alpha_{i-1})(\alpha_i - \alpha_{i+1}) \cdots (\alpha_i - \alpha_{d+1})}}}\]
Note that for \(u_i(x)\) to be well-defined, all constant terms \(\alpha_i - \alpha_j\) in the denominator must be invertible. This is guaranteed in a field since \(a_i - a_j \neq 0\) for \(i \neq j\) (as they are all distinct).
Current
Note has been deleted
Field-by-field Comparison
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Text |
Note 14: ETH::DiskMat
Note Type: Cloze (with MathJax)
GUID:
y`5($Q$d37
Deleted Note
Front
- {{c2::
- Assoziativität: \((a * b) * c = a * (b*c)\)
- Neutrales Element existiert: \( a * e = e * a = a \)
- Jedes Element \(a\in G\) hat eine Inverse: \( a * a^{-1} = a^{-1} * a = e\) }}
Back
- {{c2::
- Assoziativität: \((a * b) * c = a * (b*c)\)
- Neutrales Element existiert: \( a * e = e * a = a \)
- Jedes Element \(a\in G\) hat eine Inverse: \( a * a^{-1} = a^{-1} * a = e\) }}
Current
Note has been deleted
Field-by-field Comparison
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Text |
Note 15: ETH::DiskMat
Note Type: Cloze (with MathJax)
GUID:
BG+yKyLb,^
Deleted Note
Front
Back
Current
Note has been deleted
Field-by-field Comparison
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Text | ||
| Extra |