Anki Deck Changes

Commit: c8e27ddc - add pprog

Author: obrhubr <obrhubr+noreply@noreply.com>

Date: 2026-03-29T17:00:51+02:00

Changes: 2 note(s) changed (2 added, 0 modified, 0 deleted)

Note 1: ETH::2. Semester::PProg

Deck: ETH::2. Semester::PProg
Note Type: Horvath Occlusio
GUID: cO[`KBc1Y*
added

Previous

Note did not exist

New Note

Front

ETH::2._Semester::PProg::05._Java_Threads::3._Wait,_Notify,_NotifyAll ETH::2._Semester::PProg::10._Parallel_Algorithms::1._Task_graphs_and_performance_measures
image-occlusion:rect:left=.188:top=.0218:width=.1707:height=.1299:oi=1
image-occlusion:rect:left=.6722:top=.0274:width=.1798:height=.1285:oi=1

Back

ETH::2._Semester::PProg::05._Java_Threads::3._Wait,_Notify,_NotifyAll ETH::2._Semester::PProg::10._Parallel_Algorithms::1._Task_graphs_and_performance_measures
image-occlusion:rect:left=.188:top=.0218:width=.1707:height=.1299:oi=1
image-occlusion:rect:left=.6722:top=.0274:width=.1798:height=.1285:oi=1
Field-by-field Comparison
Field Before After
Occlusion {{c1::image-occlusion:rect:left=.188:top=.0218:width=.1707:height=.1299:oi=1}}<br>{{c2::image-occlusion:rect:left=.6722:top=.0274:width=.1798:height=.1285:oi=1}}<br>
Image <img src="paste-a0b41120bbf53b7cb0281590bee8270931d2e9da.jpg">
Tags: ETH::2._Semester::PProg::05._Java_Threads::3._Wait,_Notify,_NotifyAll ETH::2._Semester::PProg::10._Parallel_Algorithms::1._Task_graphs_and_performance_measures

Note 2: ETH::2. Semester::PProg

Deck: ETH::2. Semester::PProg
Note Type: Horvath Classic
GUID: d_dUxxN=bE
added

Previous

Note did not exist

New Note

Front

ETH::2._Semester::PProg::05._Java_Threads::3._Wait,_Notify,_NotifyAll

Can we replace AtomicInteger with just Integer here?

Back

ETH::2._Semester::PProg::05._Java_Threads::3._Wait,_Notify,_NotifyAll

Can we replace AtomicInteger with just Integer here?
No, x+=1 would create a new Object for an Integer.
Field-by-field Comparison
Field Before After
Front <img src="paste-34b8fd391b7f1347466980d0a81c3c303805002d.jpg"><br>Can we replace AtomicInteger with just Integer here?
Back No, x+=1 would create a new Object for an Integer.
Tags: ETH::2._Semester::PProg::05._Java_Threads::3._Wait,_Notify,_NotifyAll
↑ Top